On the heels of the summer season swinging into fall, midterms begin ramping up. Is it really a coincidence that big media began its banning rampage? Twitter began a new algorithm called the QFD ban, which not only coincidentally targeted conservative accounts, but even congressional conservative representatives. Jim Jordan, who recently announced his bid for House speaker, is just one of the many members speaking out against Twitter censorship.
Twitter also suspended a prominent account of Gavin McInnes, his founded organization Proud Boys, and several members. Not only that, Mike Tokes' organization called the New Right, was banned along with the co-founder.
To further expose the double standard among big media, Candace Owens reworded another Twitter account's racist tweet, word for word, and got immediately suspended for a few hours. Sarah Jeong, New York Time's new hire, posted several anti white tweets, which Twitter allowed to stay up. It's clear that healthy conversations are being decided with political bias.
Facebook banned Alex Jones from their own platform, sparking outrage not only from a conservative standpoint, but created a martyr out of Jones, in which even liberals voiced their concern over the precarious edge of free speech among social media platforms.
It's obvious at this point that big media is colluding to interfere with the midterms. I mean, it's just incredibly convenient that conservative accounts with thousands of followers are being banned behind algorithms, while less prominent liberal accounts with following counts as low as 500 are thriving without interference. Really, why do big media monopolies get to decide what is news, what is low-quality tweets or what is deemed to be sensitive content under a Christian's bible verse post? Where does the line blur so much that free speech in the age of media sets a dangerous precedent? It's a slippery slope when the tentacles of media monopolies get to control exactly what kind of content or knowledge even is acceptable for consumption in a free market.
So what can you do?
Vote. Get out in the midterms. Our livelihoods are at stake. Free speech is already on a slippery slope. The biggest, most powerful statement you can make this fall in midterms is to vote exactly like your life depends on it.
Because it does.
Because if the midterms didn't matter, big media would never have felt the need to engage in active election interference.
Written By FULCRUM Contributor @PinkAboutIt
Were Americans lied to about cannabis for a generation? Is this plant an integral part of human evolution, and a beneficial anti-anxiety and maybe even anti-carcinogen? Don't miss out! Subscribe now to get August's podcast interview between David and CBD/dispensary expert Ara, recorded on location in Denver, Colorado.
This is your time to shine, Alex Jones & Infowars! Do NOT melt down; remain eloquent, make fools of these Satanic, censoring freaks to the max. Then lawyer up and take them down.
The CIA published a 292-page document in November of 2017 that had been recovered from Osama Bin Laden’s compound and confiscated. Many know Osama Bin Laden had been trained by the CIA back in the 1980s. The following summary is based solely on this piece authored by Fritz Springmeier in 1995, with the information and opinions coming from Springmeier, from his research. All information covered is from the time when the book was written and does not reflect any of the families movements after 1995. In the book titled Bloodlines of Illuminati, written by Fritz Springmeier, he goes into great detail who the top 13 Illuminati families are and the influence they have over the world. According to Springmeier, Satan blessed 12 bloodlines in mockery of God’s 12 tribes. One of the bloodlines was the Ishmaeli bloodline that developed assassination techniques, alchemy and other occult practices. Another bloodline was the Celtic/Druidic/Egyptian bloodline from which Druidism was developed. One bloodline was from the orient and developed oriental magic, where as another was from Canaan and the Canaanites. This lineage had the name Astarte, then Astorga, then Ashdor, and then Astor. One of the bloodlines goes back to Babylon and descended from Nimrod. The royalty of the tribe of Dan, which was used as a Judas Iscariot-type seed and descended down through history as a powerful Satanic bloodline. The Satanic House of David, the 13th and final bloodline was copied after God’s royal lineage of Jesus. This 13th bloodline was instilled with both the blood of Lucifer and the blood of Jesus.
Throughout history, the occult world has ruled behind the scenes, and kept hidden from history books. The Mystery Religions each had three secret councils that ruled them, and these councils came under the guidance of a secret supreme Grand Council or Governing Body. These Mystery Religions ruled several factions of the world, from education, to military, to banking, and media. Springmeier’s friend, David Hill named the following names in his notes,"Yes, it is a fact: the Mellons, Carnegies, Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Dukes, Astors, Dorrances, Reynoldses, Stilimans, Bakers, Pynes, Cuilmans, Watsons, Tukes, Kleinworts, DuPonts, Warburgs, Phippses, Graces, Guggenheims, Milners, Drexels, Winthrops, Vanderbilts, Whitneys, Harknesses and other super rich Illuminated families generally get along quite well with Communists, who supposedly want to take away the wealth of these men and give it to the people.”
In Springmeier’s Bloodlines of Illuminati, he references several books, one of which is his Be Wise As Serpents, which I strongly recommend you thumb through.
THE ROCKEFELLER BLOODLINE
The Rockefellers have “hidden trusts within secret trusts within secret trusts,” which at the time this book was written they had somewhere between 200 and several thousands of trusts and foundations. It’s very difficult to trace not only the bloodline of these families, but their money as well. With so many front groups, a lot of their money and connections happen in the shadows. The finances belonging to the Rockefellers are so well covered that Nelson Rockefeller paid absolutely NOTHING in income taxes for the year 1970, even though he was considered one of the richest men in the United States. Most of the Rockefeller’s wealth has been locked up on the notable family trust of 1934, which hold the bulk of the fortune and matures on the death of the fourth generation and is administered by Chase Bank. There’s also the trust of 1952, also administered by Chase Bank, the corporate successor to Chase Manhattan Bank. These trusts consist not only of the shares in companies like Standard Oil, and those offshoot companies connected to Standard Oil, but other diversified investments as well as the Rockefeller’s considerable real estate holdings.
The home life of the Rockefellers is much different than that of most people. They have over 100 homes, some in Ecuador, Brazil, and Monte Sacro Ranch, Venezuela, to name a few. They also own vast amounts of land in various countries in South America. They have at least two mansions in Washington, D.C., and numerous ranches around the United States. With resorts in Puerto Rico, Hawaii, and the Caribbean, a 32-room 5th Ave duplex in New York, their place at Seal Harbor, Maine, and the large estate at Pocantico Hills, NY. They have an estimated 2,500 house servants.
The Rockefeller family’s claim to fame was made in the US petroleum industry during the late 19th and early 20th centuries by John D. Rockefeller and his brother William Rockefeller, primarily through Standard Oil. The Rockefeller’s also have long been associated with and control of Chase Manhattan Bank. The family’s wealth has always been under the complete control of the males in the dynasty, despite their wives who had influence over their decisions.
The Rockefellers provided large grants to various religious organizations, with their influence contributing to various anti-Christian organizations being set up. Their influence and control help determine who will get publicity in all major news magazines, television, and other media. The Rockefellers prove large shares of the money that Seminaries in the United States need to operate-The Union Theological Seminary has operated from Rockefeller funding and it’s well known that education can influence the religious values of the people. One of the principle large foundations that were instrumental in controlling various religious institutions was the Sealantic Fund, which was specifically geared toward religion. Another one of the Rockefeller’s main areas of influence is over religion-especially in the United States.
In 1902, John D. Rockefeller and Frederick T. Gates created the General Education Board. Rockefeller gave it $180 million. Frederick Gates envisioned “The Country School of To-Morrow”, wherein “young and old will be taught in practicable ways how to make rural life beautiful, intelligent, fruitful, recreative, healthful, and joyous."
In the 1930’s insane amounts of money were spent in education by both the Rockefeller and Carnegie foundations. The money went mainly to promoting John Dewey, Marxism, a One-World-Government agenda, and socialism. The foundations, (principally the Rockefeller and Carnegie foundations), stimulated two-thirds of the total endowment funding of all the institutions of higher learning in America during the first third of the 20th century.
The Rockefeller Foundation was the primary culprit behind the teaching of socialism in American schools and universities and also behind the NEA’s policies. In 1934 the NEA report advised, “A dying laissez-faire must be completely destroyed and all of us, including the ‘owners’, must be subjected to a large degree of social control.” Reece Committee Counsel Rene Wormser wrote of the investigation,” proving there may be a good reason for people to suspect certain lead educators in the United States wanting to bring about socialism through the use of the school system. Rene Wormser, Counsel for the Reece Committee reported, “A very powerful complex of foundations and allied organizations has developed over the years to exercise a high degree of control over education. Part of this complex and ultimately responsible for it are the Rockefeller and Carnegie groups of foundations.”
Catholic institutions have also been recipients of large grants from foundations connected to the New World Order. The Episcopalian Church, the Unitarian-Universalist Church, and the Episcopalian Church are all playing big roles in the New World Order for the Satanists. Springmeier claims that he doesn’t believe the Pope is in the Illuminati, but that he believes the Pope does carry out transactions with them and coordinates his actions according to the instructions given by the Illuminati.
One of the magazines that the Rockefellers have some control over is TIME magazine. Andrew Heiskell, TIME’s board chairman was associated with David Rockefeller. Another Illuminatus of the 6th level was Henry J. Fisher who ran McCall’s magazine from 1917-1956. The establishment’s media promoted Anton LaVey’s Church of Satan into prominence as well. New York Daily News ran a story on Jan. 31, 1967 about Anton Lavey performing the first Satanic wedding ceremony in America, while the March 1970 issue of McCall’s featured a big write up about the Church of Satan. On June 19th, 1972, TIME Magazine provided more coverage for LaVey with an article titled, “The Occult: A Substitute Faith.” When was the last time you remember seeing devout Christian groups with such nice (and free) publicity? Springmeier points out that Knights of Templar Mason Charles T. Russell, founder of the Watchtower Society, and 33° Mason Billy Graham, who works for the New World Order both get free press and publicity in the form of these publications all the time. Rockefeller and Hearst worked together in their news monopolies, with Heart promoting both books on Satanism and Billy Graham at the same time. Hearst made Billy Graham famous by financially backing him and publicizing his works. Rockefeller was supportive of Billy Graham’s New York Crusade, and the Manhattan-Chase bank also helped Billy Graham rise to stardom with financial contributions to Graham and his crusade.
Maurice Strong, who promotes Mother Gaia worship, is a close family friend to the Rockefellers. David Rockefeller works with Maurice Strong and his New Age ideas. Reverend Moon from Korea, who calls himself Christ and is setting up a religion that promotes internationalism has been very much loved by the Rockefellers. His religion is a good testing ground for the brainwashing and recruiting techniques that are being perfected by the NWO. The Rockefellers have been helping Moon, who has his primary mansion in New York. Other prominent political figures that have endorsed Moon are those with ties to the NWO, including Ted Kennedy, Mason Jesse Helms, Mason Mark C. Hatfield, & Illuminatus William F. Buckley, Jr.
Lucis Trust put out a book Externalization of the Hierarchy by Alice Bailey, that spells out the plan for Satanists and New Agers on how the spiritual hierarchy (the demonic hierarchy) is to externalize their rule of the planet. David Rockefeller is part of the Lucis Trust management team. Alice Bailey, President of the Theosophical Society and part of Lucis Trust (formerly Lucifer Trust), tells us who will rule when the New Age (New World Order) eventually takes over. Bailey believes that the ruler of the Earthly plane and all of humanity has been given to Lucifer. On the spiritual level, called “Shamballa-the Holy City”, the coming ruler is given as “The Lord of the World”, which Christians know as Satan. Lucis Trust knows it’s Satan too, but for public consumption they say that the “ruler of the world” is Sanat (a scrambling of letters in Satan) Kumara. They also predict that a Christ Consciousness will emerge, as well as the Christ (who is truly the Antichrist). Externalization of the Hierarchy teaches that the three vehicles in which will usher in the New Age will be the Masonic Lodges, the churches, and finally education.
In Southern Belgium there is a castle called Mothers of Darkness castle. In the castle is a cathedral and in the cathedral's basement, a little baby is sacrificed daily. The castle is described in Springmeier’s book Be Wise as Serpents. The history in the book reveals facts behind the propaganda that the world’s major news media give to the gullible public. It describes how Abraham Lincoln was actually a descendent of the Rothschilds, and how he was the secret head of the Rosicrucians, as well as a member of their 3-headed top council. Adolph Hitler was also a secret member of the Rothschild lineage, carrying out blood sacrifices to open his mind up to high level demonic spiritual control. Rockefeller sold Hitler oil during WWII via Spain to keep WWII going longer. The history in this book mentions people that the “history books” given to the public do not mention such as Michael Augustus Martinelli Von Braun Rheinhold, the most powerful Satanist in the world at the time the book was written. He had 66 Satanic Brides. The Satanic book in the basement of the cathedral in the Mothers of Darkness castle mentions the Rockefeller bloodline. Only insiders are supposed to know what’s happened over the course of human history. The real decisions, the real movers and shakers of our world have been suppressed and hidden from the public’s eyes. The public is instead given a stage show where Illuminati puppets parade around and make large speeches according to the script they’ve been given. Each of the 13 families have their own secret Satanic leadership of Kings, Queens, Princes and Princesses of Darkness. The Rockefeller family, for instance, has those who are selected as the Kings and Princes, Queens and Princesses that are strictly bloodline and secretly rule over an area of the world. The Illuminati pulls its various bloodlines together under several councils. The Grande Druid Council, or The Council of 13 is the principle council for the Brotherhood of Death. Above The Council of 13 is a higher Council of 9, and an inner group of 3 that is believed to head the Council of 9, according to ex-Satanists who have turned to God and want to expose the Illuminati and the darkness that comes with it.
According to Springmeier, all members of the Illuminati are Satanists, all are subjected to trauma-based mind control, all members of the Illuminati have multiple personality disorder. When a member of the Illuminati bloodline reaches 3-years-old, he or she goes to meet an Illuminati Grande Mother (a high-level Satanic priestess). These meetings are held twice a year and are attended by all Illuminati families and their Mothers of Darkness. The Grande Mother examines and evaluates seven Illuminati children, and if the child is deemed worthy of entry into the Illuminati, he or she gets assigned to one of the Illuminati bloodlines. Each child that is approved, another is sacrificed and his or her blood is used to write the name of the newly-approved Illuminati child in the book that remains in the basement of the cathedral at the Mothers of Darkness castle.
The Rockefellers are able to give donations from one organization they control to another they control without ever losing control of the money. The donations look impressive, but the Rockefeller bloodline hasn’t lost any money. The Rockefellers also own Texas Instruments, General Electric, and Eastman Kodak. They also control Boeing. Monarch programming has been found to take place at one of the Boeing plants. Delta is also controlled by the Rockefellers. Prince Charles is also from another Satanic bloodline and acts as the spokesperson for Lucis Trust as well as working closely with the United Nations in various ways.
It should be noted that the Rockefellers were involved in the creation of the FBI, and the FBI has always acted as the strong arm of power for the Illuminati. This is why there are so many official FBI programs in action today to kidnap children and provide them for sacrifice. Indeed, the wolf has been set in charge of guarding the chicken coop.
The organization working as part of the FBI is the Finders actually helps to cover kidnappings of children and when the Illuminati began to be exposed for their part in the Franklin Savings & Loan case in Lincoln, NE, the dirty actors in the FBI who were involved also helped to cover it up. Prominent citizens of Nebraska, along with high-level U.S. politicians were involved in the enormous child prostitution ring which centered primarily on Lawrence E. King Jr., who ran the now defunct Franklin Community Federal Credit Union in Omaha, Nebraska. The ring was allegedly part of “a cult of devil worshipers involved in the mutilation, sacrifice and cannibalism of numerous children.” When Congress wanted to investigate the CIA’s wrongdoings they appointed a commission headed by Rockefellers to investigate their misdeeds. With the Rockefellers working hand-in-hand with the CIA to create Monarch slaves, the CIA was overlooked for any wrongdoings in the case. A man by the name of Michael McArthur, who at the time this book was written was a recent convert from Satanism, has given validated inside information about the FBI and CIA programs that kidnap children in order to supply Satanic rituals with sacrificial material. He told Springmeier the following people were spending their official government time kidnapping children for sacrifice: Chucky “Mike” Peters-FBI hit man in Div 5 of FBI, Nichol Harrah-FBI agent who abducts children for sacrifice, Unda Krieg- Satanist working for FBI, Ken Lanning-FBI agent who abducts children for sacrifice, Nick O’Hara-FBI hit man, Satanist, has covered FBI child kidnappings by murder, Kape Richardson-CIA agent who abducts children for sacrifice.
The Rockefellers control both education and religion in this country, but also have played key roles in the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). Rockefeller wrote the book The Future of Federalism which supports the union of nations into a world government. For many years the Rockefellers have been pouring billions and billions of dollars into projects and international groups that are working to bring the public One-World government. A One-World government that combines super capitalism with communism.
The transcript from a 1991 Bilderberg group meeting in Baden Germany, attended by Bill Clinton, amongst other NWO soldiers, proves how deluded David Rockefeller”s views truly were. Rockefeller stated, “We are grateful for the Washington Post, The New York Times, TIME Magazine and other publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march toward a world government...The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.)
THE ROTHSCHILD BLOODLINE
Springmeier starts this section of the book out with illustrating how the Rothschild’s came into their fortune, “Two neighbor horse farmers came together one day to talk business. The first farmer sold his horse to the second for a quarter million dollars and then bought it back for about $20 more. He could now advertise his horse (actually worth $20), as a horse he that he had paid over a quarter of a million dollars for.”
When Turkey fought on Germany’s side in WWI, a few powerful Jews, including the Rothschilds were responsible for the wording of the treaty that was imposed on Germany, ending WWI. The treaty gave the Rothschilds the German owned railway rights in Palestine (which had been a part of the Turkish Ottoman Empire), thus paving the way for the Rothschilds to have secure leverage to dictate policies concerning Palestine. At the time, the Rothschilds had made loans to Turkey that amounted to almost one hundred million pounds. When the Turkish government collapsed after WWI because they had been on the losing side, the Rothschild’s then had control over Palestine due to the unpaid Turkish loans. The British government were given a mandate over Palestine, and the Rothschilds were able to-through their proxies in the British government-create the steps that led to the nation of Israel.
The Rothschilds, like all of the other 12 Illuminati bloodlines believe that money makes the world go round, and if you have money you can do ANYTHING. Money to them is “God” and it is to be both worshiped and served.
A great poet-philosopher (and banker’s son) Heinrich Heine said, “Money is the God of our time, and Rothschild is his prophet.” Heinrich Heine (a Jew), following the cue of the Rothschilds, signed his name by drawing the Seal of Solomon. According to Springmeier, Amschel Rothschild is reported to have said, “Give me control of a nation’s money supply, and I care not who makes her laws.” Today, his descendants meet twice daily in London to dictate to the world what the price of gold will be. They also dictate what the “Federal Reserve System” will do with America’s finances.
The Rothschilds worship Satan and set a place for him at their table. They have been Satanists for many generations. The Rothschilds are an important part of the history of the Seal of Solomon (also known as hexagram, Magen David, six-pointed star, and the Star of David). The Seal of Solomon was not considered a Jewish symbol before the Rothschilds began using it. Throughout the Middle Ages the Seal of Solomon had been used by Arab Magicians, Druid witches, Cabalist magicians and Satanists. One of the few ancient uses of the symbol can be found on the floor of a 1,200 year old mosque found where Tel Aviv is located today. In the twelfth century an Ashkenazic Jew Menahem ben Duji, who thought he was the Messiah, used the magical symbol. The early Rothschilds chose the surname Bauer (meaning farmer in German), perhaps to fly under the radar with a more common and bland name that meant “farmer”, the had less of a chance of standing out. Some Jews had taken on surnames to fit in, but the use of a symbol was much more popular. Since the Rothschilds were Satanists, it only seemed right that they adopt this powerful magic symbol in 1822 for their coat-of-arms. The name they adopted for their family actually comes from the 17th century when Mayer Amschel Rothschild began hanging out a red hexagram in front of their house to identify it. He then decided to take the name red-shield (Rothschild in German) after the red Seal of Solomon that they used. Not only was the Rothschild influence seen in Secret Societies, but also in Christendom Churches. The Salvation Army, under the suggestion of the Rothschilds adopted the Red Shield (Roth-red, Schild-shield) as their logo.
In A Treatise on White Magic, by Alice A. Bailey, she claims that the hierarchy has a special group which she calls “the financial group”, which is the latest group, according to Bailey that is directed by the hierarchy. Bailey states in the book, “The financial group controls all that can be converted into energy, and which constitutes a dictatorship over all modes of intercourse, commerce and exchange.”
In 1836, Zvi Hirsch Kalischer, an Orthodox German Rabbi approached Rothschild and proposed Rothschild buy all of Erez Israel. The creation of Israel by the Rothschilds took many years, and with them being the primary force behind its creation, it’s only fitting the nation carries their magical Seal of Solomon as the state logo. The ultra-orthodox Jews in Israel will not serve in the Israeli army because they know that the Almighty God was not behind the creation of modern Israel, but rather the rich and ungodly apostate Jews. “They refuse to serve the ungodly and are more wise than men like Jerry Falwell who run around proclaiming Israel is God’s nation,” Springmeier states. Some object that the conspiracy of power is labeled Jewish rather than Satanic by certain concerned citizens, which is valid, but Springmeier asks, “will these objectors then take the obvious next step and admit the nation of Israel which the Rothschild’s created is Satanic and not Jewish?”
King David had nothing to do with the occultic hexagram becoming their treasured Magen David (Star of David), although his son Solomon did when he began to worship Ashtoreth (star, also known as Astarte, Chiun, Kaiwan, Remphan, and Saturn). Solomon built altars to Star (Astarte, aka Ashtoreth). The god Saturn is associated with the Star but both Saturn and Astarte have been identified with a number of other names. Saturn is an important key to understanding the long heritage this conspiracy has back to antiquity. The city of Rome was known originally as Saturina or the City of Saturn. Much of the Saturn worship in the Roman Catholic church is retained in its rituals. Saturn also relates to Lucifer. In various occult dictionaries Saturn is associated with evil and was considered sacred to the religion of Mithra, as well as the Druids.
It’s said that all roads lead to Rome, in this book Springmeier illustrates how all paths of investigation lead to the Rothschilds. “The Jews, the Masons, the Intelligence Communities, the International Bankers, the Prieure de Sion, the Catholics, the Trilateral commission, the CFR, the New Age, the Cults-- each ties back to the Rothschild’s power,” Springmeier says.The House of Rothschilds use the same method that royalty has for centuries, marriage. The Rothschild children have had their spouses chosen on the basis of alliances that would benefit the House of Rothschild but they generally have married cousins the last two centuries to keep the bloodline clean.
Early in the 19th century, the Pope came to the Rothschilds to borrow money. According to Springmeier, The Rothschilds were very friendly with the Pope, which caused one journalist to sarcastically say, “Rothschild has kissed the hand of the Pope...order has at last been re-established.” Over time, the Rothschilds were entrusted with the bulk of the Vatican’s wealth.
Researcher Eustace Mullins writes that the Rothschilds took over all of the financial operations of the worldwide Catholic Church in 1823. At the time Springmeier’s book Bloodlines of the Illuminati was written, the great wealth of the Russian Czars was entrusted to the Rothschilds, $35 million with the Rothschild’s Bank of England, and $80 million in the Rothschild’s Paris bank. The Rothschilds also financed the Russian Revolution which confiscated large portions of the Orthodox Church’s wealth. The money that was invested in the Russian Revolution was not only paid back directly by the Bolshevists in millions of dollars in gold, but by grabbing the vast deposits of the Czar’s wealth, the Rothschilds, in turn, gained what in 1995 was worth over $50 billion.
“These powerful bankers relate to faith in God as Cain related to his brother Abel,” Springmeier states. These Satanists are now the ones who run the Federal Reserve and are responsible for the creation of U.S. Federal Reserve notes. Having total control over the supply of the United States paper money gives them leverage over the rest of the world’s finances too without ever mentioning they control the world bank. Once control over the world’s finances came into play, the began to divide and conquer and set out to destroy both the Christian and Muslim faith in God. The Rothschild plan was to place family members in the 5 largest European capitals to coordinate their activities. The Kaiser of Germany referred to the Rothschilds when he said, “the magic powers of money as wielded by the Lord or Lucre are powers of Black Magic at its blackest.”
According to one source, “it was estimated that they controlled half the wealth of the world.” The Federal Reserve Bank of New York was controlled by five banks which owned 53% of its stock. All five banks were controlled by Nathan M. Rothschild & Sons of London. When you have control over the U.S. Fed, you basically have control over the entire world’s money. You will find that other private enterprises that use the word “Federal” in their name are controlled and directed by the Rothschilds, including Federal Express.
Victor Rothschild, who worked for J.P. Morgan & Co was an important part of M15 (British Intelligence). He was also a communist and a member of the Apostles Club at Cambridge. Lord Rothschild was one of the original members of Rhode’s Round Table group which developed into the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). Cecil Rhodes had been financed by the Rothschilds beginning in Africa. Other agents serve the Rothschilds including the Morgans and the Rockefellers.
In “Who Owns the TV Networks,” written by Eustace Mullins, his research showed that the Rothschilds had control over all three U.S. networks, plus other aspects of the recording and mass media industry. They also control Reuters. It appears that CNN, which began as an independent challenge to the Jewish Network monopoly, succumbed to the system and is now run by the elite as well. According to Mullins’ research the New World Order’s financial systems control Congressman, and is also involved with INSLA, the Iran-Contra Scandal, Centrust, and other recent scandals). We all know how much Americans love their television, as they sit and absorb whatever the “program” projects onto them. On a day-to-day basis, the largest way the Rothschilds touch the lives of Americans are through the three major networks that are under the Rothschild’s direction. In the early 18th century, the five Rothschild brothers, each in the five major European capitals, set up their own private courier system which was faster than the regular mail. The Rothschild had news whether political or economic faster than anyone else including the monarchs, and they understood how to make use of it. Think of how money could be made if you knew how to predict the future. The normal correspondence between Rothschilds was in code. Their world was one of finance, politics, secrecy, and in the anti-Napoleonic time period, the Rothschild’s wealth increased ten-fold. The Rothschilds ran behind an invisible wall of secrecy. The Mafia-like closeness of the Rothschilds, with their tactic to situate themselves in all the major capitals, owning their own news/intelligence and mail service gave them the upper hand to manipulate all kinds of business opportunities.
The influence the Rothschilds had on America is so massive, it will only be touched on briefly. In 1837 August Belmont came to the U.S. during the Panic of 1837. August Belmont appears to have been a Rothschild by proxy. Belmont bought up government bonds during the panic and his success eventually led him straight to the White House where he became the “financial advisor to the President of the United States,” His policies were influential in pitting the North against the South for the Civil War. Judah P. Benjamin, who according to A. Ralph Epperson was the Civil War campaign strategist for the House of Rothschild held many key positions in the Confederacy. He was apparently connected to John Wilkes Booth. J.P. Morgan has also been called an agent of the Rothschilds. His father was one of the many elite, who made their fortunes by shipping supplies past the North’s blockade and into the Confederacy. J.P. Morgan, who was a major supporter of an American centralized bank is reported to be related to Alexander Hamilton. In 1869, J.P. Morgan went to the House of England and formed Northern Securities as an agent for New Court in the United States. He shuttled back and forth between London and Paris, presumably following orders from the Rothschilds and when he returned to America and instigated the Panic of 1907, it created the “need” for a central bank. (The Masonic slogan “Order Out of Chaos” comes to mind, or problem, reaction solution.) Another man connected to the Rothschilds, who made his fortune slipping supplies past the North and into the South, was Thomas House. His son, Colonel Edward M. House was one of the main Illuminati figures to control America during the early 20th century.
The Rothschilds helped to finance the secret society called The Round Table Group who in 1909-1913 formed Round Table groups in British dependencies and the United States. Eight of these round-table groups were still functioning well into the 1970s. In 1919, Sir Abe Bailey and the Astors financed the creation of the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA), which in turn created spin-off organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations in the United States. The top three families who stand out in the creation of the Round Table groups are the Greys, the Astors, and the Rothschilds. We will cover the Astor family in a future publication at great length.
We may never know exactly how occultism was introduced to the Rothschilds, but since their ancestors have been rabbis it probably first appeared in the form of Sabbatism, Jewish Cabalism, or Frankism. The House of Rothschild is known to practice gnostic-satanism. The path of the Rothschild reign can be followed throughout the past three centuries in the form of control over the world’s nations, religions, and resources. The saying “follow the money” comes to mind. All roads truly do lead to the Rothschilds.
The Satanic plan given in detail to the Illuminati was to create a thesis and its opposite, and antithesis. The process would repeat itself until the desired outcome was produced. Out of the battle between the two would emerge the synthesis, out of the battle of chaos, would come a new order--the Masonic slogan “Order out of chaos”. If the thesis were like a hammer, and the antithesis the anvil, what was caught in between would be broken or reshaped. Three world wars would enable the plan to be successful. The hammer would be constructed and then given a homeland--a secure base in Russia, and would be called communism. The first anvil would be created out of economic chaos in Germany and would be called National Socialism. The anvil would of course, be destroyed in a second World War, but another anvil would replace it by the name of democracy.
The first two World Wars accomplished exactly what they were set out to accomplish. Out of the first war came: A secure Satanic dictatorship in Russia with a secure base to carry out further world subversion, the Satanic family of Rothschilds who gained partial control over Palestine, and prepared the way for Satan to rule from Jerusalem someday, weapons of mass destruction and terror were created as well as the forming of The League of Nations.
Out of the Second World War came: The enlargement of their secure base in Russia into a world power, complete control over Palestine by the Rothschilds, airpower, including long-range missiles, secret flying saucers, jets and powerful submarines--all items that individuals themselves could not produce--so those who were in control of production would therefore, control the air and seaways of the Earth, the cold war and an era of terror to convince the people of the need for Satan’s One World Order, and the development of the United Nations.
The plan after the third World War is for a new religious system to emerge. Satan told his highest slaves in order to accomplish this new religion the war would have to be tailored to be just like the Bible’s Armageddon because if it were to resemble Armageddon, then the people would believe that he was the Messiah when he appeared at the end of World War III. The war would have to be so terrible that Satan stepping in to offer order out of chaos would not only be welcomed, but something people would beg for.
At the very core of the One-World-System is Satanism. It hides itself behind fronts such as Aryanism, British Israelism, Zionism, Jewish Finance, Socialism and Freemasonry which are all tools used to get the broad masses to serve their plan. Nazism was a Pagan Gnostic religious system whose High Priest Hitler knew what he was doing in relation to Satan’s mission. The allegiance of the Satanic hierarchy is not in the least bit concerned with Judaism, although it may appear that the first plans were to create a religious leader that will have apparent credentials of the Jewish Messiah. The actions of the Rothschilds during and post-WWII show that their allegiance is not to Orthodox Judaism, nor is it to the Old Testament, but solely to Satan. Adolf Hitler’s father was the offspring of the Rothschild’s secret breeding program which impregnated his grandmother. Hitler was groomed for his role, without realizing his heritage. It seems Hitler didn’t learn of his Jewish bloodline until after his takeover of Germany.
Satan’s selective breeding program has been passed down through the ages, yet hidden from the eyes of the general public. One of the most powerful Rothschild families in America are the Springs. When they first came to America, they went by Springsteen, but eventually shortened the name to help hide their identity. Leroy Springs was hired by LC. Payseur, head of one of the most powerful families in all of North America. The Payseurs have been so powerful that they were able to hide both their wealth and power and use the other Satanic families as proxies. The Payseurs are part of the top Illuminati families. Leroy Springs’ father was A.A. Springs and A.A. springs was the secret father of Abraham Lincoln. Mind blown yet?
In 1808, Nancy Hanks, from the McAdden Scottish family visited some of her family in Lincolnton, N.C. While visiting the Springs family, Nancy was impregnated by A.A. Springs, and her child was born, Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln’s Rothschild blood was kept very secret, but he did grow up to be a famous lawyer, secret leader of the Rosicrucians, and of course, President of the United States. A.A. Springs, the biological father of both Leroy Springs and Abraham Lincoln left a vast amount of land in what is now Huntsville, Alabama to his son Abraham Lincoln. Huntsville, Alabama has become a hotbed of NWO activity, with mind-control research for the intelligence community being conducted in Huntsville. The Rothschilds named one of their boys after Abraham Lincoln, his name was Lincoln Rothschild. Even though Abraham Lincoln secretly had powerful occult blood, he was a great man by his own right and just like JFK, he had the strength of personality to stand up to the Illuminati’s instructions. However, they both paid the price with their lives.
The Rockefellers and Rothschilds are only two of the 13 Illuminati families that are covered in Fritz Springmeier’s book Bloodlines of the Illuminati. Fulcrum News will be doing an in-depth summary of more of the Illuminati families, including Disney, the Collins, Astors, and more.
Written By FULCRUM Contributor Haley Kennington
REMINDER: This is a summary of what was uploaded on the CIA website. We are not endorsing or supporting these claims.
FULCRUM BUMPER STICKERS & CAR MAGNETS NOW AVAILABLE HERE.
HELP SPREAD THE WORD ABOUT REAL NEWS!
For whatever reason, this old tweet from the General's Verified account is making the rounds on Twitter this weekend. Maybe the Dorsey censorship cloud is already lifting slightly? The looming threat of under oath Congressional testimony can do that to you, we hear.
They're not letting us have a voice, in America. That is unacceptable. Jack Dorsey, FULCRUM is going to come after you with everything we've got.
Time to boycott this anti-American circus monkey who thinks mass censorship of Trump's supporters, in America, is acceptable. It is not.
I won't stand for it another millisecond.
Effective immediately, we have suspended our use of CashApp, because it is Dorsey's company. All Dorsey companies - Twitter, Square, and CashApp - should be boycotted by patriots.
When a coffee shop or retail store has the Square point-of-sale checkout, inform the clerk or store owner you'd love to make a purchase, but you'll take your business elsewhere - no support of this circus monkey's companies.
He wants to destroy the nascent independent media (us) through outrageous, un-American censorship.
Expect more content here on FULCRUM, and less engagement with our audience on the rigged Twitter platform.
Don't use CashApp.
Don't use Square.
Don't use Twitter.
Delete or stop using your Twitter account; let the tweet volume fall, this will anger and frighten investors in Twitter. If you support Trump, your tweets aren't being seen anyway. "Quality filter ban," which FULCRUM's account was hit by, and then they suspended our automated account which only tweets out our articles.
Why should all of us support a failed and DISHONEST platform with our time?
You've been slowing the tidal wave of truth in America and around the world for quite long enough, Jack. Time to destroy everything you have ever built. Then, we get to work on personal accountability and make sure you spend a lot of time in federal prison. There was child pornography all over Twitter, you were told about it by thousands of us, and took no action on many of the accounts. Illegal and evil.
The storm is here. And this storm will hold nothing back.
We have been banned yet again. This needs to stop. We will no longer be using the @CashApp.
FULCRUM is suspending our use of @CashApp, effective immediately. Time to boycott all @jack companies.— Censored FULCRUM (@Fulcrum__News) August 2, 2018
Please send future tips to our team via our PayPal.
Jack, your censorship of us and millions of other law abiding Americans is insulting. Your karma is about to ripen, 🐒
Confirmed that the CIA has just uploaded a 1995 compendium written by a secret society researcher. The world is a stage. Now you know. (Note: tomorrow's newsletter has a lot of information on the compendium's relevance to current events.)
It's everywhere now, and a proliferation of affected generations succumb to its allure. You get direct, front row access to anyone and anything from your phone, and it’s been scattering the streets since the 1990's. I’ll give you a hint: you’re probably a culprit. That’s right, Social Media. I’m not calling you out or anything, I’m guilty to the daily use of Instagram just as much as the next guy. In fact, in this article, I want to break down a brief history behind social media, but also address the various pros and cons to the effects it's had on our society and culture.
Prior to social media, we had chat rooms and forums, which have been around since the 1970's, mostly used through bulletin board services (BBSes) or exclusively by university campuses. Beginning in the late '90s, the first recognizable and public social media website, Six Degrees, was introduced. It had basic features including a bio and the ability to follow or “friend” other users. In 1999, blogging sites were popularized. This then gave birth to sites like MySpace and Facebook and, later, Twitter. In the early 2000s, photo sharing sites such as Photobucket and Flickr would kick-start arguably the most popular one today – Instagram. Originally, the creators wanted to recreate the look of Polaroids, which was what the first version had the posts resemble. Not to add any unnecessary bias but, personally, I miss those days. I also miss not seeing accounts where every post is a selfie (what’s the deal with that anyway?) or a clip of frat bros running into a tree... although, I do love a good cat meme. Online individualism would inevitably come to this as showcased in shows like Ridiculousness and Tosh.0. Those types of silly videos were continued through an app called Vine, launched in 2013 and acquired by Twitter. In essence, it gave humanity six seconds to prove how moronic we can be, albeit very entertaining. YouTube was the big boom of 2005, introducing a video platform for artists, musicians, and comedians like Bo Burnham, Ariana Grande, Karmin, and, yes, Justin Bieber, as well as many others to share their individual talent and further their careers. There is hope that the internet is used for good and not evil, but no promises. All this highlights both a pro and, naturally, a con.
Social media has made fame come easily. Got a special talent? Post it online and earn money for each individual skill – good. However, a decade later of this and we might as well be encouraging narcissism and, inevitably, trolling or harassment. Art provokes thought and opinion, but it may also provoke attack, resulting in“trolls”. Web Comic Penny Arcade created the “Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory”: “normal person + anonymity + audience = total fuckwad.” Living behind a screen offers a heightened sense of freedom that can turn you into an asshole, a narcissist, or if you’re lucky, an activist. Mike Godwin proposed a natural law of online behavior: “As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving the Nazis or Hitler approaches 1. In short, the more you talk online, the more likely you’ll be nasty; talk long enough and it’s a certainty.” After all this, we have to ask ourselves if the internet has done more harm than good. Anonymity is both a pro and con in the way that privacy is good but what one may do in private may not be. It’s a battle between individual rights and the rights of the people.
There is no cure-all solution, this completely depends on us; how each of us chooses to act online. Behind these screens, we are granted the right of choice. We can choose to display ourselves however we want, regardless of how we truly are in the real world. Despite our usually-fiendish nature, never before have we been able to meet and explore people from the other side of the world so easily. Can we just pause and acknowledge what an incredible gift that is? Ignoring the obvious possibility of being “catfished” or, my personal favorite, taken. When everyone is good to each other, social media thrives. The choice is yours, as an anonymous individual.
Written By FULCRUM Contributor
Clare Bronfman, daughter of the late former Seagram chairman Edgar Bronfman Sr., was charged with an indictment related to the activities of NXIVM.
The newsletter rises above trends and pursues the TRUTH.
From currency to politics and cannabis, our aim is to inform where others are shy.
Written in-depth by David & the research team each week plus an exclusive monthly podcast!
Add your email HERE!
As Trump traveled to Helsinki to attend a summit with Putin, the media and liberals amped up a hashtag which trended quickly on Twitter.
Dubbed #TreasonSummit, liberals had apoplectic tweets about the ordinary summit that every leader has taken since Reagan was President. In reality, even with Rosenstein's press conference ahead of the summit and the indictment of 12 Russians for interfering in elections, it was still emphasized by Rosenstein that NO Americans were involved. Indicating once AGAIN, as he did back in March, that Trump was cleared of any collusion charges.
Tweets from Obama administration's top ex-intelligence officials, the same individuals ensnared into the ongoing controversy surrounding a politicized FBI interfering in the election of 2016, were among the many.
Super convenient, right? To have the same FBI officials who brought the questioning of integrity among the FBI, be the first to bark about Trump and his ordinary summit. Of course, media threw their own gasoline on the fire with partisan reporting.
Democrats also piled on the remarks, such as Adam Schiff.
Rand Paul was crucified for agreeing that diplomacy has to happen, without putting emotion into the mix, in order to have open communication and avoid a war.
Geraldo Rivera called out the partisan press saying anything that Trump did would have been spun negatively no matter what.
Scott Adams had his own humorous take in the whole summit, pointing out the persuasion laid out in the press conference.
The reality is the media will always find something negative to say about Trump. But what about the 400 million dollars Russia paid into the Clinton campaign? Putin isn't to be trusted for sure, and everyone agrees that. But wouldn't that statement warrant discussion? An alleged 125k paid to Stormy somehow seems more of a bigger story because of Trump's name next to it. But put Trump's name next to that 400 million, the press would be covering it for the next two weeks. This is why media and its predictable outrage will not serve the Democrats well for midterms.
Written By Fulcrum Contributor @PinkAboutIt
The Full House Judiciary Committee Hearing can be viewed HERE. And if you weren’t able to catch the full day of testimony presented during the Strzok hearing on July 12th, here’s your Fulcrum summary version:
The first 90 minutes of Thursdays hearing was nothing short of explosive with Democrats conveniently running the clock down every chance they got, interrupting others set time, calling points of order, shutting down oversight and demanding recorded votes be taken before moving forward.
When House Oversight Chairman Trey Gowdy began to question Strzok, only a few minutes into the hearing, Democrats erupted in objection. The question posed to Strzok by Gowdy was in regard to the number of witnesses that Strzok interviewed the during the time he was sending shameful and clearly biased text messages to his lover, Lisa Page.
Gowdy asked Strzok, “Between July 31st and August 8th, how many interviews did you conduct related to the alleged collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign?” After turning to speak with his council, Strzok replied, “Congressman as you know, council for the FBI, based on the Special Council’s equities, has instructed me not to answer questions about the ongoing investigations..((Gowdy interrupts to ask the question once again))...Congressman, I understand your question, I appreciate it, and I would very much like to answer, but as I’ve stated, as you know the council of the FBI, based on the Special Council’s equities, have instructed me not to answer questions about the ongoing investigations into Russian attempts to interfere with the election.”
“This is true for the Clinton email investigation, for the investigation into Russian interference, and for every other investigation I’ve worked on,” he told the panel. “It is not who I am, and it is not something I would ever do. Period.”
Chairman Gowdy continues his line of questioning, asking Stzrok about Mueller letting him go, “If you were kicked off when he read the text, shouldn’t you have been kicked off when you wrote them?”
Strzok replied: “Not at all.”
Gowdy: “Well, it wasn’t the discovery of your text Mr. Strzok, it was the existence of your bias that got you kicked off.
Strzok: “No, Mr. Gowdy, it wasn’t. I do not have bias. My personal opinions in no havway ever impact..”
Gowdy: “Why did you get kicked off?”
Strzok: “Mr. Gowdy, my understanding of why I was kicked off was based on understanding of those text and the perception that they might create..”
Gowdy: “Hang on a second, Agent Strzok, hang on a second–perception? You’re saying it was the perception of thirteen Democrats on the Special Council Probe, including one who went to what he hoped was a victory party. That’s a perception problem too. They weren’t kicked off, you were. Why were you kicked off?… How long did you talk to him [Mueller] when he let you go?
Strzok: “My recollection is it was a short meeting somewhere between fifteen to thirty minutes, probably around fifteen minutes.”
Gowdy: “And it’s your testimony is Bob Mueller did not kick you off because of the content of your text, he kicked you off because some appearance that he was worried about?”
Strzok: “My testimony, what you asked, and what I responded to was that he kicked me off because of my bias. I am stating to you, it is not my understanding that he kicked me off because of any bias, that it was done based on the appearance. If you want to represent what you said accurately, I’m happy to answer that question, but I don’t appreciate what was originally said being changed.”
Gowdy: “I don’t give a damn what you appreciate Agent Strzok. I don’t appreciate having an FBI agent with an unprecedented level of animus working on two major investigations during 2016.”
After Strzok’s lengthy reply, the Democrats in the room did something that you don’t see often in settings such as these, they began to clap for Strzok. As if that wasn’t strange enough, what came after Strzok’s reply was even more stunning. A motion was called to subpoena Steve Bannon for his refusal to answer some of Chairman Gowdy’s questions while under subpoena--the motion was struck down and denied by Chairman Goodlatte.
Strzok’s reply: “In terms of the text that ‘We will stop it’, you need to understand that was written late at night, off the cuff, and it was in response to a series of events that included then-candidate Trump insulting the immigrant family of a fallen war hero. And my presumption based on that horrible, disgusting behavior, that the American population would not elect somebody demonstrating that behavior to be President of the United States. It was in no way, unequivocally, any suggestion that me, the FBI, would take any action whatsoever to improperly impact the electoral process-for any candidate. So, I take great offense and I take great disagreement to your assertion of what that was or wasn’t. As to the 100 million to 1 that was used clearly a statement made in jest, and using hyperbole, I of course recognize that millions of Americans were likely to vote for candidate Trump. I acknowledge that it is absolutely their right, that is what makes our democracy such a vibrant process that it is. But to suggest somehow that we can parse down the words of shorthand textual conversations like they’re some kind of a contract for a car, is simply not consistent with my or most people’s use of text messaging. I can assure you, Mr. Chairman, at no time, in any of these texts did those personal beliefs ever enter into the realm of any action I took. Furthermore, this isn’t just me sitting here telling you-you don’t have to take my word for it. At every step, at every investigative decision, there were multiple layers of people above me. The assistant director, executive assistant director, deputy director and director of the FBI and multiple layers of people below me, section chiefs, supervisors, unit chiefs, case agents and analysts. All of whom were involved in all of these decisions. They would not tolerate any improper behavior in me any more than I would have tolerated in them. That is who we are as the FBI and the suggestion that I, in some dark chamber somewhere in the FBI, would somehow cast aside all of these procedures, all of these safeguards, and somehow be able to do this is astounding to me. It simply couldn’t happen and the proposition that that is going on, that it might occur anywhere in the FBI deeply corrodes what the FBI is in American society, the effectiveness of their mission and it is deeply destructive.
When Goodlatte called for a verbal vote to be tallied, the Democrats would have none of it and demanded a recorded vote be taken, so the clerk began to call the roll and recorded each member’s vote.
Rep. John Ratcliffe ( R- Texas) pressed Strzok about the 50,000 text messages on official FBI devices, where his bias seemed crystal clear, with Strzok sending and receiving hundreds of text messages each day:
“…F ‘ing Trump, stopping Trump and impeaching Trump-on official FBI phones, on official FBI time. Other than that, you never crossed that line. I’m sure there are 13,000 FBI agents out there that are beaming with pride at how clearly you’ve drawn that line. Agent Strzok are you starting to understand why some folks out there don’t believe a word you say, and why it is especially troubling that you, of all people are at the center of the three highest profile investigations in recent time that involve President Trump and that you were in charge of an investigation investigating, gathering evidence against Donald Trump-a subject that you hated, that you wanted to F-him, to Stop him, to impeach him. Do you see why that might call into question everything that you touched on all of those investigations? Chairman, I’m done with this witness.” Rep. Ratcliffe then walked out of the hearing, without waiting to hear Strzok’s response.
A recess was then called by Chairman Goodlatte until 2 p.m.
After returning from the short break, Republican Congressman Darrell Issa from California was given the opportunity to ask Strzok about the context of the texts sent out to his mistress Lisa Page. Issa asked a shocked Strzok to read some of the texts that were sent from his government issued phone aloud for everyone to hear. -Genius move on the part of Issa.
Strzok was clearly embarrassed,(as he should be) to have to read the messages sent to his mistress out loud for all to hear. He began with texts sent to page between March and August of 2016, including “OMG! He’s an idiot”, “Now the pressure really starts to finish MYE.”, ‘Hi how was Trump other than a douche. Melania?”, “Trump is a disaster. I have no idea how destabilizing his presidency would be.”
When asked to read a text message from Strzok’s government issued phone specifically from August 6th, 2016, Strzok says, “I don’t believe I wrote this text sir.” Issa acknowledges it, but moves forward, “Ok, it’s been attributed to you, so we’ll go on to the next.”
Strzok continues reading the text messages and picks back up with one sent to Page on August 8th, 2016 where Page asks Strzok, “Not ever going to become president, right? Right?” Strzok reads his now infamous response to Page out loud, “No, no he’s not. We’ll stop it.” Issa immediately asks Strzok to repeat his reply to Page, which he does.
Strzok picks back up with a text from August 15, 2016: “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office—that there’s no way he gets elected—but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40…”
October 20th, 2016 “I can’t pull away…What the..and I defer to the chairman.., (chairman says to use one letter for the word)..What the F happened to our country Lis?”
When Issa asks him to repeat the text again “that way”, Strzok goes on the defensive and asks Issa, “I..sir, did you not--was that not intelligible? You just want to hear it? For me to repeat it?”
Issa responds, “Please.”
Strzok says, “Ok sir. Sure, I’m happy to indulge you.” Then he rereads the text message again. “I can’t pull away. What the F happened to our country Lis?”
Issa then asks a rhetorical question of Strzok, “Why in the world do you believe that this committee should not ask for the record of similar text from your private account to find out what else you might have said about ‘insurance policies’, or about the president of the United States, or the investigation? That is a rhetorical question. You need not answer, and I yield back.”
Strzok asks Chairman Goodlatte if he can answer the question, even though rhetorical, to which Goodlatte agrees.
Strzok: “Congressman, what I think is critical..and I’m glad you brought up a lot of these, because I would like to make up the point that I did earlier…”
Issa: “I didn’t bring them up, I just asked you to read your own words.”
Strzok: “I appreciate it, sir..if I…if I may, what is important is that these texts represent personal beliefs just like those that you’d find on my personal phone. What these texts do not represent is any act, any suggestion of an act, any consideration that we need to do this..or not do this-and furthermore, I would encourage you as I believe-I forget who I said this to earlier this morning-you need to read these texts in the context to what was going on at the time. So, when I make the comment about Trump having no idea how destabilizing his presidency would be, that came on the heels of a speech where then-candidate Trump said that he didn’t know whether or not the United States should honor its commitment to mutual defense under NATO.”
The next line of questioning came from Eleanor Norton, Democratic Congressman from Washington D.C.
She asks Strzok, “We’ve been reading from your personal phone and your official phone. Did it occur to you that your personal, political messages, if they became public might be misinterpreted in light of your role in the investigation?”
Strzok replies, “Congresswoman, to be very honest, I..I didn’t anticipate that because I never thought these text would become public.”--probably one of the very few honest answers we get from Strzok the entire hearing.
Norton goes on to ask about the phone that was used for the texts, “Some of them were not on your personal phone?” Strzok replies, “Correct, yes that’s correct.” Norton points out that since they were sent on his official phone that they belong to the public.
When it was time for Congressman Steve Cohen from Tennessee to ask Strzok questions, he decided instead to spend his 5 minutes of allotted time to empathize with Strzok, even telling him that if he had the ability to, he would issue Strzok a Purple Heart, telling Strzok, “You deserve one.” Cohen continued, “This has been an attack on you, and a way to attack Mr. Mueller and the investigation, that is to get at Russia Collusion involved in our election, which is what this committee should be looking at. A direct strike at democracy,” Cohen said. Cohen added that Mr. Putin was the president’s “very good friend, and a man he cannot say anything bad about?” Cohen closed his 5 minutes by partially quoting Jack Nicholson’s famous line from the movie A Few Good Men, “You can’t handle the truth”, when referring to the investigation and said, “The truth is, this is the most corrupt administration ever and it’s going to be exposed by Robert Mueller, thank God.”
When Republican Congressman from Ohio, Jim Jordan tried to get some solid answers from Strzok about the dossier, he was given the same excuse that Strzok used earlier, that he was advised not to answer the question.
Jordan: “You already told me that you read it, I want to know who Corn and Simpson are,” to which Strzok repeats he’s unable to answer the question.
Jordan: “I know what you’re saying, I know what you’re saying. Ok, let me ask you this, did you ever communicate with David Corn?
Stzrok said no, he had no communication with David Corn, Glen Simpson or Nellie Ohr, but he admitted he had been in communication with Bruce Ohr.
Jordan asked when he communicated with Bruce Ohr, to which Strzok answered, “My recollection is somewhere between three, four or five times in the late 2016, early 2017 time frame.” When asked what they talked about, again Strzok said he was not able to answer any further than they spoke about investigative matters.
Jordan asked one last question of Strzok: ” Glen Simpson testified in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee on August 22nd, 2017 he was asked: ‘Did anyone from Fusion ever communicate with the FBI, his response, ‘No, no one from Fusion ever spoke to the FBI.’ So here’s what I’m having trouble understanding, if Glen Simpson says no one ever spoke with the FBI, how is it you got a copy of the dossier from Simpson?”
Strzok: “Sir, I can tell you I never had contact with Fusion, with Mr. Simpson, with Mr. Corn.”
Jordan: “This is the frustration that every single member of this committee feels,is when Agent Strzok won’t answer, well more importantly, the American people feel Agent Strzok won’t answer fundamental questions like-the guy he references in an email, Corn and Simpson, and won’t tell me who they are…this is unbelievable, but that’s where it’s gotten to now and it’s as frustrating as it can get. Mr. Chairman, I yield back.”
Trey Gowdy tries again to get answers to his earlier question about the dates of July 31st and August 6th of 2016, but again, Strzok said he was unable to answer the question and would have to refer back to his case file in order to give Gowdy the answer he was looking for.
During this period, the Democrats interrupted three times to ask why Gowdy was being allowed to ask Strzok questions during “their time” and even asked Goodlatte if he simply made up rules as he went along. Goodlatte clarified that this was in fact, not “their time”, but that they were making time for Strzok to be able to answer a question which in the first segment of the hearing he was told he could not answer. What changed? Who knows. The answer was still the same, he would have to check his case file and report his findings.
Gowdy specified why he was asking the specific question, “Chairman, I appreciate you letting me make that clear, and again the context when you would not answer it was you used the word impeachment on May the 18th, 2017 and you used the impeachment on May the 22nd, 2017. Your testimony is you can’t recall a single interview you would have done as part of that investigation that was supposed to lead to impeachment, and I think that line of questioning, and I’m glad the FBI finally realized it, albeit a couple hours too late. When you are prejuding not just a result, but a punishment, which is what impeachment is, when you are prejudging the conviction and the sentencing, when you have not conducted a single, solitary interview, I’m sorry Agent Strzok, but that is letting your bias impact your professional judgement.”
Strzok: “Sir, so look, I never prejudged anything. Not in this case, not in any others.”
Jordan: “Impeachment for what Agent Strzok? Impeachment for what?”
Strzok: “At the time I was a deputy assistant director, I have section chiefs, unit chiefs, in the field, supervisors, agents, people who typically do interviews, not me. If something is notable or high level, I might be involved, but it would be rare-if never that it would be typical that I’d get out there and conduct interviews. Second, you mentioned the use of the word impeachment, that was used in the context of my not knowing what this would lead to. I was not prejudging impeachment, when I used that term it was saying it might be nothing, it might lead all the way to something on the…..(unintelligible)
Jordan: “Agent Strzok, are you kidding me?”
Things really got heated when Congressman from Texas, Louie Gohmert, questioned Strzok about his affair with Lisa Page, the first time it had been pinpointed since the hearing began.
“There is the disgrace,” Gohmert said. “And it won’t be recaptured anytime soon because of the damage you’ve done to the justice system. And I’ve talked to FBI agents around the country. You’ve embarrassed them. You’ve embarrassed yourself. And I can’t help but wonder when I see you looking there with a little smirk, how many times did you look so innocent into your wife’s eye and lie to her about Lisa Page?”
As you could probably guess, the Democrats lost it. “You need your medication,” yelled New Jersey Democratic Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman.
Strzok finally responded, “I have always told the truth. The fact that you would accuse me otherwise, the fact that you would question whether or not that was the sort of look I would engage within a family member who I have acknowledged hurting, goes more to a discussion about your character and what you stand for and what is going inside you.”
Gowdy had the opportunity to question Strzok one last round of questions and Strzok seemed to do a lot of ducking and weaving around questions claiming most of his text messages were hyperbole.
Congresswoman Bonnie Watson Coleman took to screaming at Trey Gowdy, “If you can’t control yourself, how can you expect this committee to control itself? You’ve been out of control since you’ve been on this committee. This is not Benghazi.”
Clearly getting the attention of Gowdy, the Congresswoman from New Jersey took to attacking the president rather than asking Peter Strzok any questions. “You have nothing to do with the president of the United States disgracing this country every single solitary day when he embraces our enemies and is disrespectful to our allies.” She went on a rampage over President Trump by mentioning that it wasn’t Strzok’s fault Trump imposed higher tariffs on Canada, carved out opportunities for Ivanka’s business opportunities with China, and that Puerto Rico is still “underwater with no power.” She then gave her remaining 2 and a half minutes to Strzok, giving him the opportunity to use it however he saw fit. Strzok took that time to reiterate that he was telling the truth, and just how much he loves the FBI.
After another recess, Congressman Eric Swalwell from California asked if Strzok had considered pleading the fifth at the hearing, to which Strzok replied that it was never an option for him. “No, I’ve done nothing wrong. Let me rephrase that. I am sorry. I am sorry for these texts, and the way they’ve been used for the harm and hurt they’ve caused my family, for the perception of people in the public, and I am sorry and deeply regretful for that. But when it comes–that’s a personal acception to responsibility that I take, that I need and that I’m working to make right. But when it comes to official conduct, when it comes to any action which would violate a law or crime, absolutely, I’ve never done that and have no need to take the fifth.”
Swalwell, apparently thinking that the hearing wasn’t ridiculous enough, took to pulling out several large photos, while asking Strzok equally ridiculous questions when each was held up.
While holding up a photo of Michael Cohen and Felix Sater, Swalwell asks, “On November 3rd, 2015 did you send an email to Michael Cohen and say that ‘Our boy can become president of the United States and we can engineer it. I will get Putin’s team to buy in on this,’ Did you send that email?”
“No.” replies Strzok.
Swalwell moves to his next question, holding up a photo of Donald Trump Jr.,“Did you set up a meeting on June 9th where the email setting up that meeting was sent to Donald Trump Jr.? Where Donald Trump Jr. was offered dirt on his father’s opponent? Did you set up that June 9th meeting at Trump Tower?”
“Without stating whether or not that meeting happened, I did not set up a meeting,” Strzok replies.
Swalwell continues, “Did you reply to the emails setting up that meeting when dirt was offered and said, ‘I love it’?” Strzok replies, “I did not.”
One last photo was held up, this time of Donald Trump and Swalwell asked Strzok if he’d written one of Donald Trump’s speeches. “And in the summer of 2016 were you working as a speech writer?,” asks Swalwell.
Strzok replies, “No.”
Swalwell asks, “So, would you have happened to have written the speech for Donald Trump that candidate in the summer of 2016? Where he told an audience, ‘Russia, if you’re listening and then went on to tell the Russians that if they hacked Hillary Clinton’s emails they’d be rewarded, Did you write that speech?”
Strzok answers, “I did not.”
Another notable line of questioning came from Congresswoman Karen Handle from Georgia. While addressing Strzok said, “Your assertion that your statements do not constitute bias is, well, absurd.” Handle went on, “Truly ironic, did I hear you say earlier that you’re in a senior position for the HR division for the FBI? ((Handle giggles)) That’s very ironic.” Handle asked Strzok, “Did you ever advise Mr. Mueller about your relationship with Ms. Page?” Strzok replies, “I did not.” Handle asks Strzok, “Why?” To which Strzok replies, “It did not strike me as relevant.” Handle, in her own “mic drop” moment responds saying, “You have a lot to learn about human resources. I mean...wow. It is absolutely relevant.”
Sheila Jackson Lee had her chance to make a statement at the very end of the hearing, but when Chairman Goodlatte asked her if there was any statement she would like to make, she responded by trying to ask Strzok a question about General Flynn. Goodlatte swiftly shot her attempt at asking Strzok anything and reminded Lee that this was not the time for any questions. Lee said she would leave it on the floor, but that she thought it “would be good to clarify it, because I’ve asked others.”
She, without missing a beat continued, “But, let me finish my remarks. In the concluding comments, Mr. Strzok, again, I believe this hearing, in this long period of time showed no bias in the decisions regarding the final report on Hillary Clinton’s emails. She was vindicated. Nothing changes the Russian interference in our election of 2016. Unfortunately, no questions were asked by the Republicans about the Russian interference. In the GOP, in many instances would not let you, Mr. Strzok, answer the questions. Finally, the hearing did not give the American people, I think, the important answers that they needed. And that is how will we secure our elections in 2018. That unfortunately plays into Putin’s hands. It also did not respond or did not answer, ‘what do you do when White House officials have not gotten their own security clearance?’ And finally, let me be very clear. When our country is attacked, I want to make sure that the FBI and not the KGB shows up. We need to do a better job of answering the concerns of children that have been snatched away from their parents, the violation of voting rights, the need to end gun violence, and many other issues. But today, you stood the test of time, atleast. You’ve admitted fault and certainly admitted that you would have wanted to do things in a better way. But it cannot take away your service in the United States Military, your service in the FBI and your willingness to offer, if you will, your deference and concern about the continuation of the FBI and its service to this nation.”
The ten-hour long hearing finally came to a close promptly at 8 p.m. with Chairman Goodlatte being sure to stress his disappointment with the way the hearing had gone--not only with Strzok’s refusal to answer most questions, but also with some of the behavior that had been witnessed throughout the hearing.
“Many members on the other side of the aisle have attempted to denigrate this investigation and in particular this hearing today. One going so far as to calling it ‘stupid’. This investigation and hearing aren’t just about reviewing the 2016 election, however important that is. This is a much bigger matter. Our investigation and this hearing goes to a larger global and existential issue of the quality under the law. So, for my democratic colleagues to call this review ‘stupid’ denigrates the importance of our founding principles in the core of a system of justice. I’d venture to guess that most Americans don’t view equality under the law and fair and unbiased investigations as ‘stupid’. Mr. Strzok, this has been a lengthy hearing, so thank you for your time today. It has been extraordinary frustrating though in trying to get answers to many important questions. I understand that you have refused to answer many questions on advice of the FBI. You have also said that you cannot answer questions on advice of council, because it could disrupt the ongoing Mueller investigation. So, we are presented with a situation where you have not answered questions from Congress under the cover of the FBI and Special Counsel Mueller. Neither the FBI nor the Special Council is mentioned in the constitution. Congress is, and we have a constitutional right to have answers to the many questions that have been posed to you. While you have consistently referred to the FBI as the ‘ultimate arbiter’ who is preventing you from answering questions today, the FBI director reports to the deputy attorney general. The FBI is a component of the Department of Justice. So, at the end of the day, deputy Attorney General Rosenstein, who has oversight over the Federal Bureau of Investigation and over the Mueller investigation is where the buck stops. We now consider the Department on the line in addition to the FBI for failing to permit you to answer questions that don’t even go to the substance of any investigation, but have focused on your involvement in the process of those investigations. This is unacceptable. Congress has been blocked today from conducting its constitutional oversight duty and more importantly, the American people have not received answers on why our chief law enforcement agencies and agents and lawyers operating within them permitted improper bias to permeate through three of the most important investigations in our nation’s history. The constitution’s construct of congressional oversight over the executive branch has been severely undermined today. We will resist attempts to prevent us from getting to the facts. This is not over and you as well as future witnesses are on notice that fulsome answers are expected promptly. With that, this hearing is adjourned.”
Peter Strzok’s mistress Lisa Page, after completely defying her subpoena to testify publicly to Congress (just the day before the hearing), was given one last chance to appear before Congress on Friday--one day after the hearing--after being threatened with being held in contempt if she did not show.
Lisa Page, however, did appear before Congress on Friday and was rather helpful. Although lawmakers declined to give details of the testimony, the questions themselves were centered around the infamous text message exchanges between her and lover Peter Strzok.
“She’s been willing to help in the spirit of transparency….We’ve certainly learned additional things today,” said Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC). Her willingness to help with the investigation into the FBI during the Clinton email scandal “speaks well of her”, Meadows added.
Rep. Mark Meadows thinks that the American people “would be happy” with what investigators learned during Friday’s closed-door hearing, adding that he found Lisa Page to be both “cooperative” and “credible.”
Meadows referred to Page as a “credible witness” as he left the hearing on Friday. “There is new information,” he told reporters. “And that information is credible.” He continued, “She’s doing her best to help us find the truth and I think in ways she’s been falsely accused of not being willing to cooperate.”
Congressman from Florida, Matt Gaetz questioned the bureau’s presence in Page’s private testimony on Friday.
“Lisa Page is not an FBI employee, but the FBI was here providing counsel and giving her direction as to which questions to answer or not answer and there is a question as to the propriety of that before the House,” Gaetz said, according to the Hill. He also said he found Page to be “more credible” than Strzok, as reported by the New York Post. “I didn’t agree with her characterization of every text message and every piece of evidence, “Geatz said as he left the House hearing. “But we did not see the smug attitude from Lisa Page that we saw from Peter Strzok.”
As Page left the session, she did not answer any questions posed to her by reporters. She is due Monday afternoon for yet another closed-door testimony, according to the Washington Post.
Written By Haley Kennington
What we perceive as freedom is more like an open-air prison, complete with harsh penalties for exploring your mind, rigged currencies our masters own most of, and even rigged leaders.
When you look at the game theory of the last 30 years, US Presidents have been doing things that are illogically harmful toward the American populace, as well as toward the world.
The trillions of dollars lost in the Middle East and millions of casualties in Iraq alone, and what do we have to show for it? Those were open-ended wars that never concluded in decisive victory, by design.
The financial crisis in 2008, and millions of foreclosed on families—that was a consolidation wave for these ‘ruling’ families. Legalized theft.
If you have a lot of money—I mean, more than anyone—and if you really hate the United States, yet you’re old and weak and mostly wear black and mumble incoherent nonsense because you’re high on walnut sauce (adrenochrome) half the time, then you don’t take us on militarily.
You do it gradually, through proxies.
You find compromised sickos like Obama, or the Bushes, or the Clintons—plenty of sickos in this world without values, I’ve learned through covering the Pizzagate scandal—and once you have them properly compromised enough (Bill Clinton flew on the Pedo Express to Lolita Island a documented 26 times; a US President went to a pedophile blackmail island run by a billionaire associate of the Rothschilds, not once, but 26 times).
When you look back through the Boystown scandal, which was hastily covered up by the pre-Internet age media with the force of a military air campaign, it is clear that the Bushes and many of their business associates are simply sick, deranged people.
For people who literally invented many of our modern fiat currencies, as the Rothschilds did, spending a couple hundred million (at most) on propping up a Clinton or Bush or anybody else is not unreasonable—it is practical.
The close working relationship between Lynn Forester de Rothschild and the Clintons revealed by Hillary Clinton's WikiLeaks is precisely what they didn't want the world to see.
Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State, of the United States, when she was carrying out personal favors for Lynn Forester de Rothschild's family on the world stage. Fact.
Why stop there? Why not buy up the media that covers these politicians?
So they have. The Economist is literally published by Lynn Forester de Rothschild and the Rothschild family, and it’s a leading voice against Trump economic nationalism, and American prosperity in general, in favor of “globalist” values.
Maria Bartiromo, a popular CNBC host favored by the President, has been photographed with Lynn Forester de Rothschild looking so chummy, the two could be long lost sisters.
President Trump’s own adult daughter Ivanka has dated a prominent member of the Rothschild clan in the past. And close Rothschild associates have found themselves in some of Trump’s cabinet positions.
Nowhere is free from their influence. John McAfee, the successful anti-virus maker with a spun off software company that bears his name, has become a vocal advocate of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin over the past several years. Just the other day, he tweeted about coming across the Rothschilds in the Arizona desert—joke or serious, either way, you can tell he was unsettled by the whole thing, whatever the interaction was.
“Will they let us leave? If so, at what Cost? And when? And will we be allowed to take our complete selves with us when we go,” McAfee tweeted yesterday from his verified account.
Oh, that’s not foreboding at all! A wealthy software engineer just terrified of the Rothschilds.
Back when Pizzagate first broke, I was told “there are some families you should not mention,” and obviously we don’t agree with that at all at FULCRUM.
It goes against the basic tenets of Western journalism, and the basic tenets of Western life, as well as the values of life in a republic.
The Rothschilds have more money than everybody? They allegedly rig politicians, own major media outlets, compromise law enforcement offices, kill their competitors, and engage in PEDOVORE practices (as in, they molest and eat children; scared children are a source of adrenochrome).
Oh, I think that’s the sort of thing we should talk about all day long, until these hacks are fully outed for what they are.
Adrenochrome is very important in elite Luciferian circles; it’s a psychedelic drug with effects reputed to be similar to LSD.
Many business executives and politicians secretly rely on adrenochrome “trips” to gain insight into future business or policy decisions. “Walnut sauce” is one popular nickname for adrenochrome in such elite circles.
It is highly addictive, as far as psychoactive drugs go, and the unacceptable process by which it is harvested requires secrecy.
Hence all the secrecy.
The reality is that millions of people already know about the Rothschilds—a documentary about them on YouTube has been viewed more than 4,000,000 times already, and countless books have been written on the historical Rothschild family.
Their banking dynasty began in the 1700s under Mayer Amschel Rothschild, who began his business in humble circumstances out of a small dwelling in a Frankfurt ghetto.
The business grew significantly under subsequent generations of Rothschilds, and Mayer Rothschild himself was honored by Forbes Magazine in 2005 as one of the 20 most influential businessmen of all time.
The perversion and political distortion our planet has endured under the bizarre Rothschild family is very real.
It needs to end, and we suspect it will end—a family this sick cannot withstand mass public discussion and mass public scrutiny.
Nor can a family of currency monopolists economically survive the Big Bang of cryptocurrency economics.
Although not financial advice, Bitcoin is simply better money than the slave debt tokens the Rothschilds created out of thin air. It’s a better way of doing business. It’s rare and capped at an eventual 21 million coins, so your wealth can’t be eroded over time due to Rothschild bank inflation.
The Rothschilds very well may be the biggest real-life villains of all time. “Eyes Wide Shut,” Stanley Kubrick’s last film before his death, was reported to be a light “outing” of what the Rothschilds are into—very light, to be sure.
Do you want to live under these people?
And neither did Satoshi Nakamoto, who invented and launched Bitcoin nearly a decade ago, then disappeared a couple years after it was launched—once Satoshi was satisfied that the community understood his software sufficiently, and could maintain it, he disappeared without a trace and has not been heard from definitively by anybody in eight years.
Bitcoin, and other rare cryptocurrencies, present humanity with an alternative to the Rothschilds since their banking family began its sad, strange reign.
In only nine years, Bitcoin’s network has gone from a value of zero to a value of $109 billion as of earlier today.
Millions of people use it, in part because millions of us don’t want to scramble for made-up debt tokens preferentially held by the Rothschilds.
For what it’s worth, Putin is aware of the Rothschilds and routinely calls out their underling George Soros on Russian television, which is part of why the Rothschild-controlled press in the West has been so anti-Putin, and anti-Russia more broadly. They can’t have a superpower that knows what they are about, and Putin knows.
Many in America’s halls of power know now also, and like so much else lately, it will be America that decides the fate of these degenerate banking families. Do we need this occult banking family with its roots in 1700s Europe? Or is it time for a clean break, and something new?
As of today’s tally, FULCRUM News reaches a minimum of 38,462 smart, awakened or awakening readers and viewers. And this tally is not inclusive of other company assets, including the popular weekly newsletter, monthly podcast, and the web site itself — we have been publishing ad-free real news on Fulcrum.news since we launched in January 2017.
After relocating to the nation’s capitol earlier this year from Colorado, where we were headquartered previously, we invested heavily in originally sourced reporting and fact checking.
Going where the facts lead is sometimes unpopular, and often uncomfortable, yet that’s the proper role of a self-respecting news organization. Our numbers would be undoubtedly larger if we went for low hanging fruit like QANON, and avoided contentious topics including child trafficking and central banking billionaires, yet these topics are worthy of public scrutiny.
In fact, we can’t think of topics more important than central banking usury or systemic abuse of children by political elites, and we find it weird when others in the so-called media try to paint us as jokers or irresponsible for covering the issues they should be covering 24/7, rather than the triviality and manufactured outrage they pursue.
With real news, the outrage doesn’t need to be manufactured, because the reality is disturbing enough.
For example, Pizzagate—the claim that ultra-wealthy elites connected to the Clintons traffic in children, for occult and sexual purposes—is demonstrably true, as revealed to millions of objective and intelligent people on the Internet with the release of the Podesta emails by WikiLeaks back in October 2016. Can’t deny reality, yet many have tried.
As another example, the reality that the Federal Reserve is an undemocratic foreign-controlled financial institution working in the best interest of private shareholders rather than American citizens, and the reality that US “dollars” under the Federal Reserve have lost more than 95% of their effective value since the Reserve was chartered into being in 1913, are both true and public knowledge.
Yet the media chooses to fret and wring their hands every time Bitcoin, a promising and still tiny open source currency, dips in value—which is to miss the forest for the trees. The entire market capitalization of all bitcoins in the world is around $107 billion at the moment, or many billions of dollars less in value than the market capitalization of McDonald’s public stock (about $124 billion). That’s right: the futuristic Internet money the mainstream media has their panties in a bunch over is still worth less than one publicly listed fast food chain, yet the media follows it closely and exaggerates every pullback because their masters are terrified.
If Bitcoin works, and work it has so far, the entire reason for the Federal Reserve’s existence falls by the way side.
BUY/SELL BITCOIN OR ETHER HERE ($10 BONUS LINK):
Sign up for Coinbase >>
You may ask: why build a news organization and a community where you avoid the easy pitches that would lead to growth (QANON, Trust Sessions theology, bashing weed, etc.) while reporting the truth consistently? And why maintain a global community of readers and viewers who are smart, independent, and impossible to convince of something untrue?
Well, the answers should be obvious here: we wanted a real news title people can depend on in these times, and we desired a community where we would feel at home—rather than alienated.
In the long term, consistently reporting truth and tackling the Big Stories are not things that will hurt us. A community with a sense of purpose, seeking out truth with humility, is bound to grow—it seems the entire Internet is looking for the truth about things. So we are in a good position.
Help the community grow, or just watch and read. Either way, thank you.
Not yet a subscriber? Join in seconds to get the weekly research newsletter and monthly podcast!
Not financial advice; no warranties or guarantees provided. Bitcoin is still experimental technology and can increase or decrease in value over time.
You have to wonder about QANON, who parrots the ambitions of David Brock and George Soros. Don’t focus on the Podesta emails and the blatant pedophilic criminality flaunted throughout them (“walnut saucing,” “pizza” appointments, etc). Those emails are real, and admissible in court if we ever get a real Attorney General who isn’t a Clinton buttplug. Don’t focus on the Hillary Clinton WikiLeaks and the blatant favoritism shown to the Soros, Rockefeller, and Rothschild families by Hillary as Secretary of State—so blatant it’s like something out of a bad fan fiction chapter, which brings us to Q.
QANON spun a narrative that “paytriots” have been profiting from the great Q’s message (whatever that convoluted, 9 months in narrative happens to be), yet FULCRUM lost money and took significant heat from misguided members of the public for explaining that Q is no more than a fraud run by a stay at home daddy and his Internet friends in alleged need of those precious ad revenue dollars.
Q supporters, from large social media accounts all begun on or around January 2018 (a full year after the inauguration of President Trump in Washington, DC), urge prospective “believers” to review the “Q proofs” on a number of malware-laden sites which have popped up, exalting Q’s correct predictions with some egregious leaps of logic, and honesty.
Q appears to take many vague guesses, and the majority of those guesses have come out wrong, which is what you’d statistically expect from a guesser (not a psychic savant or administration insider) at the roulette table of worldly events.
When Q gets something right, or in the neighborhood of right, its promoters hype it as if it is lost gospel material.
When Q gets something wrong, which is often, it is silently ignored and the herd is urged to visit the CBTS (“Calm Before The Storm”) message board communities, a staging ground for complex character attacks and completely made-up narratives causing real harm to leading Trump supporters, and leading members of the pro-Trump independent media.
CBTS thought leaders throw around terms like “paytriot” and “traitor” with reckless abandon, yet seem to conveniently always sidestep the biggest actual traitors in the room: the Clintons, the Podestas, SOROS, and the lingering deepstate.
Why would so called patriots, in need of justice and a restored country free from Clinton crime, focus on attacking the reputations and livelihoods of the very Internet journalists who tirelessly promoted Trump before the election, and have supported him afterward as well?
It’s almost as if Q is a psyop to herd all these angry people, and to redirect their righteous anger expertly away from the incriminating Podesta emails — the closest the public will ever come to a free, no holds barred peek down the rabbit hole — and instead deploy them against the very thought leaders who will be needed to secure a successful midterms sweep…
Oh wait, that’s exactly what it is.
We are not paid to discredit QANON, not paid by anybody, and the numerous posts on CBTS suggesting otherwise are so unhinged and desperate in their claims, that any objective observer can see through them and can glimpse the amateur, cruel, idiotic core of the “Q movement,” which again, arrived a full year after Trump was already inaugurated.
Q promoters never seem to focus on Podesta or demanding prison time for the Clintons. Instead, they focus on Alex Jones’ custody battle, they focus on FULCRUM’s fantastical connections to Israel which exist only in the minds of CBTS cat ladies, and with increasing bizarreness Q’s communications seem designed to make the right appear paranoid, and downright awful.
The Pope didn’t have a terrible May, as Q anticipated he would. We know this because it’s now mid-July. Minorly inconvenient May, sure; the papacy had to sign off on some bishops and clerical staff resigning in South America, a move that had been announced as early as January 2018 publicly.
There aren’t 30,000, nor 35,000, nor even 40,000 sealed indictments. No Q promoter has shown a coherent list of that many sealed indictments across all US jurisdictions, nor anything close. What happened evidently is that dishonest Q promoters on Twitter and elsewhere began circulating screenshots of “tallies” suggesting these numbers, and the source numbers were either a) completely made up in many instances, a LARP or b) the dishonest cumulative total of all sealed activities in the court system, not sealed indictments—i.e. adding up search warrants, subpoenas, all other requests for information as if they are individual indictment actions, when there is no evidence to suggest that. And simply emailing us saying “Search PACER” isn’t a rebuttal, because we have lawyers who do have subscriptions to PACER, and the indictments simply aren’t there.
Those numbers, again, were arrived at by dishonest or ignorant means.
Members of the natsec community can corroborate these claims, as can former members of the legal system: stacking up super secret indictments for nearly 2 years just isn’t how the justice system works here in the USA.
The Q-driven narrative that the court system can’t “handle” the white collar Clinton corruption, nor the Podesta emails, until some unknown date when the system will be purged and replaced by “whitehats”—that’s a childish and dangerous narrative for any rational adult to hold.
The court system handles serial killers, rapists, terrorists, Bernie Madoff level fraud on a daily basis. To think it can’t handle the big fish yet, because some huckster on a message board says so, is so stupid it defies explanation.
In reality, the indictments aren’t popping up because aside from isolated instances like the now unsealed indictments of Keith Raniere and Allison Mack on sex trafficking charges, the justice system is stuck—and stuck fully in favor of the elites doing all these alleged crimes.
Why? Ask Jeff Sessions. “Trust Sessions”—another Q ploy—was disastrous to President Trump’s short-term aims and his base; instead of taking Trump’s repeated criticisms of Sessions seriously, and backing Trump up vocally in a way that would show the establishment a shake-up would be supported by the base, members of the public who followed Q thought they were witnessing a multilevel drama—one message for the public, the other for the Q “army” sitting at home on the message boards.
These people believe the President is speaking to them in code, on 8chan, an unsecure public message board community known for hoaxes, LARPs, and impersonation attempts. They believe anyone calling into question the motive of this bizarre phenomenon is paid by Israel’s Mossad or a deepstate faction of the CIA. So damaging are Q’s incorrect predictions to the deepstate that all detractors must be paid!
In reality, the opposite may be the case. Some popular YouTubers have turned vehemently “pro-Q” in recent weeks, as Q’s stranglehold over the truth community has been (finally) weakened. These YouTubers started their broadcasts with broadly pro-Q statements, allowing no room for uncertainty, without a focus on any specific claims or reasons.
Aside from the botched predictions, a widely circulated image of Trump pointing to a rallygoer wearing a Q t-shirt—as if to endorse Q—is deceptive at best. The full video clip from which it was taken reveals Trump was gesturing to the entire crowd, and the rallygoer was screaming for Trump’s attention only feet from the President’s face; not indicative of someone who knows him.
Meanwhile, the Clintons remain on never-ending global book tour, which is not indicative of people under secret federal indictment. Soros has been spotted publicly recently, as have the Podestas.
Detailed thoughts on Bitcoin and life beyond central banks. The reality of the US political climate, from our Beltway sources, rather than message board speculation. The legalization wave and its impact. Get your subscription before prices increase!
Launched in January 2017, FULCRUM is committed to the truth and following the facts. Small tips from readers & viewers keep us in business, as well as the premium subscription. Send a small tip securely using any debit card in seconds here. Or use PayPal.
Recently, rumors began spreading across Twitter and news media outlets of a possible third presidential run by Hillary Clinton. Could this be true? [ Read Article Here ]
Whether it is true or not, the idea of another run is pretty comical. I mean, we are talking about a woman, who rigged an election and STILL lost against a candidate with zero political experience. We are talking about a woman who in the aftermath, wrote a bitter book blaming others for the historical defeat to Donald Trump. We are talking about a woman, who spent almost two years on a blame tour, alienating the Democratic base from their own party.
If the Democrats had any sense, they would not let that happen. Hillary Clinton running in 2016 with the cloud of several scandals over her head, did much damage to the credibility of the Democrat party. Not to mention, her international blame tour just made them look bad. Especially after Hillary infamously once said, "Anyone not willing to accept the results of an election, is a direct threat to democracy." Proceeding with a blame tour in the aftermath, aged her tweet faster than milk left to spoil.
If Hillary decided to run, it would only help Trump, and in fact, widen the net of electoral votes. Even Donald Trump Jr, embraced the idea of a 2020 run.
Not to mention, Democrats themselves slammed Hillary back in March over comments during her India trip. During a speech, she slammed females for "voting for whoever their husbands and bosses voted for", implying that women were not independent voters in red states. The statement further alienated more democratic supporters away from Hillary in the aftermath. [ Read Article Here ]
If Hillary were to run, she would be contending for the first time, with a President having a current, higher approval rating at the same time in presidency than Obama. Alongside with the economic growth, and a victorious list of accomplishments within the first 15 months of Trump's presidency. Obama's abysmal economic growth the first time may have been an easier contest, but not the Trump economy. It would be interesting to see how Hillary would even be able to offer a message that could possibly stand up to the historical, economic accomplishments the Trump administration has already made.
FACT SHEETS: President Donald J. Trump’s 500 Days of American Greatness [ HERE ]
However, for the sport of pure comedy, it would be fun to watch. Perhaps even be the last final nail in the demise of the Democratic party as we know it.
Written By FULCRUM Contributor @PinkAboutIt